当前位置:首页 > 文献互助 > 互助详情

Different D-dimer assays with age-adjusted cutoffs to exclude pulmonary embolism: secondary analysis of ADJUST-PE study复制

用户mKQO0T3T2ANY 1小时前 8 10 求助中 帖子自动结束时间: 2026-03-21 17:57:23

1. 文件大小不能超过300M, 允许上传文档或压缩包等

2. 请确保上传文献的真实性、完整性,不得对原文做任何修改

注: 所有应助的资源仅供学习交流使用, 不得违反相关法律法规

DOI:复制

文献链接:复制

其他信息:

H Robert–Ebadi, C Combescure, O Bulla…
Journal of Thrombosis …, 2025
Elsevier
Background The multicenter prospective ADJUST-PE study proved the safety of an age-adjusted D-dimer (AADD) cutoff to exclude pulmonary embolism (PE). Objectives Assess the safety of different D-dimer (DD) assays using AADD in patients included in ADJUST-PE in Geneva compared with the originally used VIDAS DD Exclusion test. Methods This was a preplanned secondary analysis. The VIDAS DD Exclusion test was repeated to ensure reproducible results in thawed samples. Other tests performed were Innovance DD test, STA …

互助时间线

2026-03-16 17:57:23 [发起求助]